| |
-by
Erick Coleman
One of the most enjoyable
aspects of following the National Football League draft is the second-guessing
that comes about as soon as the draft is over. Maybe Alex Smith would
have been a better fit? Should Miami have gone for help at wide receiver
instead? Is Ronnie Brown really better than Cedric Benson, or the other
(seemingly) four thousand other running backs in this year’s draft?
The NFL draft is unlike any other major sports draft, and the football
fans immerse themselves in the draft like no other fans.
Second-guessing is part of life. If you put ten fans of a team in the
same room and asked them to pick the best college player; chances are
you will receive six or seven different answers. This doesn’t
even touch on the argument regarding the best available player versus
drafting for a specific need, which could fill an entirely separate
article.
The draft aftermath always comes complete with experts and prognosticators
that are willing to “rate” or grade a teams’ draft.
The funniest aspect of rating a draft in April of 2005 is this: The
last time I checked, not one of these newly drafted rookies have taken
ONE National Football League hit, or a single NFL snap. Am I really
to believe that those fellas on ESPN already know who was the “steal
of the draft” or when a team was “reaching?” The simple
fact is that no one knows.
It takes years for a draft to fully materialize as successful or not,
although there are certainly players that immediately step in and do
well. Most, however, do not. Miami’s first round pick of 2004,
Vernon Carey, could very well turn into a monster offensive lineman.
No one can really deem a first round pick a bust or a success until
that player has the time to establish themselves as a force, so I question
why I heard more than one person during this past weekend call Miami’s
round one choice in 2004 a “bust.” Not only does it take
time for a rookie to develop, but certain positions develop faster than
others (Any football guy will tell you that third year wide receivers
are golden). How is a player is used by the coaching staff is a
major key in how quickly a player matures, as are any injuries that
player has to overcome.
The Miami Dolphins are a team that has needs at, literally, every position.
Unlike a team such as the Indianapolis Colts, the Dolphins do not have
a “sure thing” at any one position. Sure, Miami has entrenched
starters at certain positions including Zach Thomas, Jason Taylor and
Sam Madison. I am not as high on players such as Will Poole or Kevin
Carter as some people are, although that is not to say I do not feel
these players were not worth picking up or maintaining. Drafting defense
is a smart move, especially in the new absence of Pro Bowler Patrick
Surtain. While I do not agree with assigning a “grade” for
any team’s drafting efforts, I would like to examine each of this
year’s draft selections and grade each player’s potential
to come in and crack the starting line up this coming season.
| 1. Ronnie
Brown is somewhat of a no-brainer in the regards of playing time.
Unlike young quarterbacks that are sometimes better suited to
carry a clipboard for a season and learn the speed of the game,
running backs seldom have the luxury of limited playing time.
This is accelerated with running backs that are picked up with
the second overall pick. Miami now has a lot of talent in the
backfield, led by what many hope is a game breaking talent. This
increases the value of Travis Minor and Sammy Morris, who can
be good change of pace backs and should get carries this season
(Morris will most likely be in competition for the fullback position).
Hudson Houck is widely recognized as one of the bright minds when
it comes to offensive line schemes, and he loves bruising backs
that can run over and away from defenders. Brown was certainly
all of that during his Auburn career, and splitting time last
year should give him fresh legs. Running into a college defensive
line is a lot different than running into Warren Sapp or Richard
Seymore, which brings me back to my point about players not yet
taking that first NFL hit. Brown will remain a mystery until tested.
2. Matt Roth is a little undersized (as of this
second) to immediately contribute as an every down defensive
end for the Dolphins. Roth, however, is molded quite like David
Bowens; a player that wants to be on the field. Roth will hopefully
make a mark on special teams right away and might be a nice
change of pace for Carter. Playing opposite Jason Taylor can
be a huge luxury for a good defensive end...just ask former
Phins sackmeister Adewale Ogunleye! Roth was originally projected
as a first round talent, but his off the field problems scared
away some would-be new homes. I don’t see this as the
major reason for Roth’s slide though, as teams that passed
on Roth also had bigger needs than a pass rush specialist. Down
the road I do see Roth as a potential headache for offensive
coordinators, much like Jason Taylor is now.
3. Channing Crowder is another “problem
child” that slipped out of favor with many other NFL teams
for off-the-field issues. Miami’s current linebackers
are mediocre at best, with an aging and oft-injured Zach Thomas
anchoring the middle and Junior Seau relegated to a part-time
role due to his age and physical limitations. Linebacker is
a position of critical need for Miami, and Chowder is a player
that could immediately step in and steal a starting job. He
has speed on the edge and rushes the pass well, isn’t
fooled by the play action, and can cover a third receiver or
a tight end well. I fully expect Crowder to be a starting linebacker
for this team and to make his mark quickly. One huge question
mark is his age; Crowder is coming out of college as only a
sophomore. This could work for or against Crowder and very well
could be a determining factor on how he pans out.
4. Travis Daniels is most likely best suited for the position
Miami prayed Jamal Fletcher would grow into...the nickel corner.
Daniels didn’t play much his first two years and then
split time his junior year between safety and corner. He is
a big kid and one of the brightest upsides is not his ability
in pass coverage (which is adequate), but run defense. Surtain
excelled in this area as well, this should not be lost in the
shuffle when looking at Daniels’ potential value to this
team. Miami needed a defensive backfield player that could defend
the pass and isn’t scared to mix it up on the run. They
may have found that player with Daniels.
5. Anthony Alabi is the biggest question mark
of this year’s draft. Alabi isn’t particularly big,
fast, or possess great feet…but he was still a very solid
player at the college level. “Adequate” is a word
that gets used a lot when talking about Alabi. Vernon Carey
came out of a more prestigious program last year as a much more
accomplished athlete and still wasn’t able to make a lot
of noise in his rookie year. “Adequate” might not
cut it in Miami. Alabi could possibly become a player Miami
can use, eventually, but don’t expect much this coming
season.
6. Kevin Vickerson is a guy that will probably
never be an all-star, but has enormous size and strength. In
a 3-4 defensive scheme, there are times that the nose tackle’s
sole function is to clog up the middle and Vickerson could be
just the guy to do that job. Neither Bowens or Chester are players
that fit that mold. Vickerson is more than a project, but certainly
not a sure thing. Vickerson has a better chance to log quality
time than does Alabi. Vickerson is certainly a “what you
see is what you get” type of players. Not an elite athlete
by any means, but big and strong enough to take up blockers.
|
Out of the six picks in the 2005 draft, I feel that five of those
picks will have the opportunity to immediately step in and gain a
lot of on the field exposure. If this turns out to be the case, I
would deem Miami’s 2005 draft as a successful one. Any draft
class that features 50 percent or more of its rookie class logging
playing time would have to be considered a valuable one.
In regards to players or positions that many feel Miami dropped the
ball on, I would like to disagree. To take a quarterback for the sake
of taking a quarterback would be a mistake, as would it be to take
an offensive lineman. Rookie offensive linemen outside of the third
round almost never pan out, and Miami’s new offensive line coach
is on record saying that the talent is there and the schemes were
not. Houck is actively working with those players while I pound away
on my Microsoft Naturals keyboard, so I’ll defer to coach Houck
to know Miami’s O-line needs better than I do. If what Houck
says is true, improved offensive line play will automatically increase
the production of the quarterback and both problems solved.
Miami needed infusions of youth at many positions, especially on defense.
They accomplished that goal in this year’s draft.
Back
to Reader Submissions.
|