|
Title: Miami V. Chicago, 1985. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: MaineDolFan on September 24, 2008, 10:36:40 am I hear this statement from time to time:
"When Miami upset the Chicago Bears in 1984..." That statement is generally made by a younger person, someone that couldn't have been much more than 10-12 in 1984 at the time. Age is important to perspective in this. I don't feel that win was an upset. I'm curious as to why anyone would? A few years ago the Broncos were, what? 12-0 - they went into a game against an 9-3 Giants team and lost. That wasn't considered an upset, it was merely one good team knocking off a previously unbeaten one. People seem to think Miami was 5-12 in 1984 or something. Ain't true. The reality of the 1984 Miami Dolphins: 14-2 regular season, only better record that year was the 15-1 Bears. I'm not seeing a huge drop off between a 14-2 team and 15-1 team, especially in that era. Miami had the #1 offense in the NFL. Miami had the #7 defense in the NFL. Miami had the #2 Differential of points in the NFL. In other words - they beat asses and badly. Miami was #5 in Takeaway/Giveaway Differential in the NFL. Marino threw for over 5,000 yards. Three RBs had 500+ rushing. Miami had 18 rushing TD's and was one of the top teams in the red zone. 42 sacks. 24 interceptions. The 1984 Miami Dolphins were a freakin' buzzsaw. Don't even get me started on special teams. So why would anything think that beating the Bears, in the Orange Bowl by the way, was "an upset?" Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1984. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: StL FinFan on September 24, 2008, 10:40:15 am I don't think it was an upset, either. I remember all the buzz leading up to this game, that this would be the one game the Bears might lose. Everyone was anticipating the game, but no one (at least no one I know) thought the Bears were a lock. I was in High School at the time. OMG I'm old!
Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1984. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: Jim Gray on September 24, 2008, 10:48:08 am That's my favorite Dolphin game of all time, and I agree - not an upset. The Bears were favored, but Miami was a elite team playing at home. I was living in Ft. Lauderdale at the time, and I can tell that most of the Dolphin fans and media were really excited and felt Miami would be competitive and the game would be close even if Miami didn't win.
The 2006 game was an huge upset. The game is in Chicago against a 7 - 0 Bears team, while Miami is 1 - 6. Miami is a huge underdog and I'm expected an ugly ass whippin' as are most Dolphin fans. Miami wins 31 - 13. Kind of sounds familiar to something that happened recently. Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1984. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: Phishfan on September 24, 2008, 10:55:27 am The Dolphins and Bears didn't play in 84. They played in 85 when Miami was 12-4. I am not sure about the rest of your stats.
Modified to add I agre with your perception about the upset though. I never had any doubt that night. Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1984. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: MaineDolFan on September 24, 2008, 11:26:28 am You're right! Oops. Okay, still wasn't an upset. Coming off a 14-2 season (snicker), Miami was 12-4 and very much an elite team.
#4 offense. 12th defense. #5 in point differential. 4,000 yards passing and 1,800 rushing. Undefeated at home. Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1984. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: simeon on September 24, 2008, 11:55:16 am The Dolphins and Bears didn't play in 84. They played in 85 when Miami was 12-4. I am not sure about the rest of your stats. I was going to say this, but you beat me to the punch. Miami was 9-4 when they played Chicago who was 13-0 at the time.Modified to add I agre with your perception about the upset though. I never had any doubt that night. It was considered an upset because Chicago was so dominate that year. I remember watching that game and I knew in my heart Miami would win so Chicago would not go undefeated. In many of our minds it wasn't an upset because we knew Dan and company would stop Da Bears and they did. Most sports writers would still say it was an upset, but we call it destiny to stay NFL'S only perfect team. Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1985. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: jtex316 on September 24, 2008, 12:18:15 pm I see your point about the Broncos Maine - but the Giants were 5-8 going in that game - they were HORRIBLE throughout the mid to late 90's. I mean HORRIBLE, bottom of the league for a good 6 years. 5-8 record was actually an improvement for them. That was no doubt about it a huge upset, and the way the game ended made for an even bigger effect (Toomer diving in the end zone for the score on the final minute).
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/199812130nyg.htm Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1985. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: MaineDolFan on September 24, 2008, 01:24:07 pm ^^Damn. Yeah, I was pretty wrong about that one.
And seeing that I had my Dolphins mixed up from '84 and '85...I think I might be wrong in my whole line of thinking here. For whatever reason I had sold myself on that it was the 84 'Phins that did the "take down the Bears" thing. Pointless thread by Maine # 4, 987. :( Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1985. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: Phishfan on September 24, 2008, 01:29:05 pm It's not pointless because your premise is correct. People do look back and consider it an upset, but I don't know why. I guess in hindsight knowing it was the only game the Bears lost helps with that theory. People tend to forget anything other than who was the champion, so the fact that the Dolphins were such a solid team that year gets overlooked unless you are a fan.
Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1984. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: run_to_win on September 24, 2008, 01:46:30 pm It was considered an upset because Chicago was so dominate that year. Agreed. The Bears had 6 or 7 blowouts in their first 12 games, including winning the previous 3 games by a combined score of 104-3.Buccaneers 38-28 Patriots 20–7 @ Vikings 33-24 Redskins 45-10 @ Buccaneers 27-19 @ 49ers 26-10 Packers 23-7 Vikings 27-9 @ Packers 16-10 Lions 24-3 @ Cowboys 44-0 Falcons 36-0 Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1985. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: Brian Fein on September 24, 2008, 01:50:12 pm an upset is any time the team favored to win loses.
the bears were, no doubt, favored to win. thus, it was an upset. Its not a surprise that they lost, in hindsight, but it was still an upset. Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1985. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: YoFuggedaboutit on September 25, 2008, 12:23:52 pm an upset is any time the team favored to win loses. the bears were, no doubt, favored to win. thus, it was an upset. Its not a surprise that they lost, in hindsight, but it was still an upset. An upset? Technically speaking yes, because the Bears were the favorites. A stunning upset? Absolutely not. This past Sunday's shellacking of the Patriots was a stunning upset. Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1985. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: landlocked on September 25, 2008, 12:39:01 pm I remember that game,and any time you bounce a pass off a guy's helmet and it goes for a touchdown......well,you pretty much know it's gonna be your night.Was it an upset?Ya,I gotta say it was,Miami was a decent team that year,but the juggernaut that was the '85 Bears was picking up steam and blowing teams out.They really needed to lose that game to bring them back down to earth.
Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1985. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: simeon on September 25, 2008, 12:44:17 pm An upset? Technically speaking yes, because the Bears were the favorites. A stunning upset? Absolutely not. This past Sunday's shellacking of the Patriots was a stunning upset. I am not so sure Miami beating New England was a stunning upset, I will say Miami beat New England in a stunning manner. However many of the talking heads on the football programs were picking Miami to win the game. It was an upset because New England was favored by 13 plus points.Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1985. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: Jim Gray on September 25, 2008, 01:35:59 pm However many of the talking heads on the football programs were picking Miami to win the game. Really? I didn't see one. Were they picking Miami straight up or against the spread? Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1985. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: simeon on September 25, 2008, 03:00:42 pm Yes on more then one ocassion I heard a talking head pick Miami, I think one of them was Deon Sanders.
Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1985. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: Sunstroke on September 25, 2008, 03:25:52 pm Really? I didn't see one. Were they picking Miami straight up or against the spread? I was panning through the pregame shows and didn't see anyone taking Miami... From what I saw, it was clean sweeps for the Patsies across the board. Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1985. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: NADS on October 27, 2008, 04:17:55 am An upset? Technically speaking yes, because the Bears were the favorites. A stunning upset? Absolutely not. This past Sunday's shellacking of the Patriots was a stunning upset. Agreed. The Bears had 6 or 7 blowouts in their first 12 games, including winning the previous 3 games by a combined score of 104-3. Buccaneers 38-28 Patriots 20–7 @ Vikings 33-24 Redskins 45-10 @ Buccaneers 27-19 @ 49ers 26-10 Packers 23-7 Vikings 27-9 @ Packers 16-10 Lions 24-3 @ Cowboys 44-0 Falcons 36-0 Miami was 9-4 when they played Chicago who was 13-0 at the time. It was considered an upset because Chicago was so dominate that year. I remember that game,and any time you bounce a pass off a guy's helmet and it goes for a touchdown......well,you pretty much know it's gonna be your night. Was it an upset?Ya,I gotta say it was,Miami was a decent team that year,but the juggernaut that was the '85 Bears was picking up steam and blowing teams out. I was in grade school then and remember being ecstatic when the Fins won this one...it really solidified by obsession with the franchise. Some of this stuff I remember because it was magic and some comes from being an NFL buff but... Fuck technicalities. The Bears came rolling into Miami 13-0 with the best defense of all time and they were nasty; destroying entire teams of QBs with arguably the best LB combo of all time including HOF Mike Singletary. I think NFL Network ranked the LB core #2 all-time only because the Saints LBs of the nineties had such a horrible offense. Da' Bears also had HOF DT Dan Hampton and William "The Fridge" Perry stuffing the interior line with Tecmo Bowl stud Richard Dent at DE. Remember that Walter Payton guy? He was pretty good. Jim McMahon didn't play but "Taco Bell" as we called him was lacking stats-wise that year. My thoughts are Miami was considered a finesse team with a young, though record-breaking, QB and kick-ass receivers. This game was about stopping Marino for the Bears and Payton for the Dolphins. Marino shredded Buddy Ryan's 46 defense. 1985 (I think) was also the first year a different receiver could make a catch off of his teammates tipped attempt. Regardless, gentleman, this was a stunning upset in every since of the word. Title: Re: Miami V. Chicago, 1985. Was it REALLY an upset win? Post by: sciotto on October 27, 2008, 06:59:07 am The win over the Bears was in '85, not '84. Miami was 14-2 in '84 and in the Super Bowl. The Dolphins finished '85 12-4.
What people forget, and I agree with your point of view, is Miami needed that win to stay in a three-way tie for first with New England and the Jets, setting up a Jet loss to Chicago two weeks later, and a Miami win over NE to give Miami the division. By the way, the score was 38-24. I can tell you the score of every Miami game, regular season and playoffs from the '73 AFC Divisional playoff win over Cincy through yesterday's 25-16 win over Buffalo. One more point, in '84 Miami was the last undefeated team and were bumped off by the San Diego Chargers 34-28 in OT, proving the old "On any given Sunday" statement. |