|
Title: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: YoFuggedaboutit on November 16, 2008, 04:50:41 pm The Philadelphia Eagles and the Cincinatti Bengals have ended in a tie after Shayne Graham missed a 47 yarder.
Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: Pats2006 on November 16, 2008, 05:47:34 pm Crazy. They showed the game but then had to change it due to NFL rules.
Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: dolphins4life on November 16, 2008, 09:42:05 pm ^^^^^
They did that in my area to the Miami Balt game last year Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: Frimp on November 16, 2008, 09:45:07 pm One of the ESPN commentators with Chris Berman said "And, 4 hours of my life that I will NEVER get back!"
Most have been a boring game, and judging by the 13-13 score, it sounds like it. Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: BigDaddyFin on November 17, 2008, 12:06:56 pm Well I had the right week but the wrong game. I was hoping for a tie in the New England/Jets game.
Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: BigDaddyFin on November 18, 2008, 12:09:46 am ALSO AS A FOLLOW UP, The all wonderful Donovan McNabb didn't know you can tie. That's hysterical.
Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: DolFan619 on November 18, 2008, 12:25:50 am The NFL should really switch to the NCAA overtime format.
Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: Tepop84 on November 18, 2008, 12:29:29 am The NFL should really switch to the NCAA overtime format. noTitle: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: YoFuggedaboutit on November 18, 2008, 01:29:00 am no Why not?? I like the NCAA OT format as well. Each team gets a chance to win. Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: Frimp on November 18, 2008, 01:30:47 am Why not?? I like the NCAA OT format as well. Each team gets a chance to win. Less of a chance for Ronnie Brown to kick ass. Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: DolFan619 on November 20, 2008, 01:44:20 pm Why not?? I like the NCAA OT format as well. Each team gets a chance to win. I know, I think that would be a good rule to adopt in the NFL. Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: YoFuggedaboutit on November 20, 2008, 05:37:56 pm I know, I think that would be a good rule to adopt in the NFL. Yes, but it needs to be adopted all the way..... once you get to the third OT, you cannot kick the extra point after a touchdown, you must go for two. Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on November 20, 2008, 06:59:58 pm The best ot proposal I have heard is no field goals. You must score a TD to win. still sudden death so if the team that wins the coin toss get it in on first possession game is over.
Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: Thundergod on November 20, 2008, 08:28:00 pm ALSO AS A FOLLOW UP, The all wonderful Donovan McNabb didn't know you can tie. That's hysterical. Heard about that. What a moron. How the hell have you played football damn near your entire life, 10 years in the NFL for christ's sake, and not know this?! MO-RON! Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: Tepop84 on November 21, 2008, 04:10:32 am Why not?? I like the NCAA OT format as well. Each team gets a chance to win. It isn't football. It is like little kiddies football where each team just runs 10 plays on offense. Field position means nothing. Interceptions mean nothing, no punting etc. Also each team in NFL overtime has a chance to win. Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: fyo on November 21, 2008, 06:45:29 am Also each team in NFL overtime has a chance to win. The team winning the coin toss wins two thirds of the time. Having such a significant RANDOM element is a disgrace and completely disrespectful of the game and the fans. I think the easiest change would be to just allow "at least one possession per team" in overtime. So if team A scores a figgie on its first drive, team B still gets a chance. Once those two first drives are over with, tough luck. At least you had a chance. Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: Tepop84 on November 21, 2008, 12:54:25 pm The team winning the coin toss wins two thirds of the time. Having such a significant RANDOM element is a disgrace and completely disrespectful of the game and the fans. I think the easiest change would be to just allow "at least one possession per team" in overtime. So if team A scores a figgie on its first drive, team B still gets a chance. Once those two first drives are over with, tough luck. At least you had a chance. It isn't that high. the team that wins the coinflip only wins like 57%. It is fair for both teams. the coinflip is a 50.50 chance to start with the ball. Losing the coinflip doesn't equate to an automatic loss. Don't say because they didn't get the ball they never had a chance. They need to play fucking defense and not let the other team score. whos fault is it that they couldn't stop the other team from marching down the field on their defense. Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on November 21, 2008, 01:37:24 pm It isn't that high. the team that wins the coinflip only wins like 57%. It is fair for both teams. the coinflip is a 50.50 chance to start with the ball. Losing the coinflip doesn't equate to an automatic loss. Don't say because they didn't get the ball they never had a chance. They need to play fucking defense and not let the other team score. whos fault is it that they couldn't stop the other team from marching down the field on their defense. That 57% is only the case if you go back to like 1974 and do the stats on every tie. With improved FG kickers plus the kick off being moved from he 30 to the 35 has changed that stat for more recent games. Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: Spider-Dan on November 21, 2008, 03:17:00 pm The college OT system is stupid for two reasons:
1) Special teams (punter, kick coverage) become irrelevant 2) There is no strategy in kickoff/receive (it's just the opposite of NFL system) The best system I've heard of is one where after the coin flip, each team gets one possession, then it's sudden death (standard kickoff rules apply). This way, there is an actual strategic choice to be made for kickoff/receive; if you receive, you know what you need to match after the first possession, but if you kickoff, you get the ball first if it gets to sudden death. Title: Re: Our first tie football game since 2002 Post by: NADS on December 10, 2008, 01:58:06 am It isn't football. It is like little kiddies football where each team just runs 10 plays on offense. Field position means nothing. Interceptions mean nothing, no punting etc. Agreed. Why not change everything in the NFL to mirror college then? Sudden death is here to stay mainly because: 1. It's tradition. 2. Sudden death is a cool football term. 3. It might mess with the over/under in close games. Sure, #3 is a conspiracy theory but it might be a valid reason. There has been a lot of froggy shit going down this season starting with that non-fumble Jay Cutler fumble against San Diego. |