|
Title: Grading the 2016 Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on April 29, 2019, 01:26:23 pm I am a firm believer you can't grade a draft until 3 years after it happened.....
Round Selection Player Position College 1 13 Laremy Tunsil OT Ole Miss 2 38 Xavien Howard CB Baylor 3 73 Kenyan Drake RB Alabama 3 86 Leonte Carroo WR Rutgers 6 186 Jakeem Grant WR Texas Tech 6 204 Jordan Lucas CB/S Penn State 7 223 Brandon Doughty QB Western Kentucky 7 231 Thomas Duarte TE UCLA I think you did pretty good. Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: Tenshot13 on April 29, 2019, 01:49:16 pm Yeah, that's pretty stellar.
Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: EDGECRUSHER on April 29, 2019, 02:36:50 pm Nailed the first 3 picks, trading up for Carroo really sucked though.
Getting Grant is the 6th round was a good find too. Really, excellent draft. 6th and 7th round picks are pure lottery tickets so you can't judge them for them unless they turn into something good. Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: CF DolFan on April 29, 2019, 02:45:39 pm They said during the draft that like 12 or more starters for New England were drafted after round 3. Look at this draft ... which is one of our better ones ... and see how far away we are from that. It looks like Grier got 3 starters (including Rosen) out of this draft. Here's hoping his lower picks show promise as well.
Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on April 29, 2019, 03:19:23 pm They said during the draft that like 12 or more starters for New England were drafted after round 3. Look at this draft ... which is one of our better ones ... and see how far away we are from that. It looks like Grier got 3 starters (including Rosen) out of this draft. Here's hoping his lower picks show promise as well. QB Tom Brady New England Patriots / 6th / 199th pick / 2000 WR Julian Edelman New England Patriots / 7th / 232nd pick / 2009 T Trent Brown San Francisco 49ers / 7th / 244th pick / 2015 T Marcus Cannon New England Patriots / 5th / 138th pick / 2011 C David Andrews RG Shaq Mason New England Patriots / 4th / 131st pick / 2015 DE Trey Flowers New England Patriots / 4th / 101st pick / 2015 DT Lawrence Guy Green Bay Packers / 7th / 233rd pick / 2011 LB Elandon Roberts New England Patriots / 6th / 214th pick / 2016 LCB Jason McCourty Tennessee Titans / 6th / 203rd pick / 2009 K Stephen Gostkowski New England Patriots / 4th / 118th pick / 2006 P Ryan Allen I guess that depends if you consider the punter and kicker as starters. However, the list of starters was anybody with 11 or more starts so it only included 10 each on def and off so you can probably add in two more guys. Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: CF DolFan on April 29, 2019, 04:04:27 pm QB Tom Brady New England Patriots / 6th / 199th pick / 2000 How freaking impressive is that? Screw the Super Bowls ... New England is killing the draft and doing it from the back of the pack. WR Julian Edelman New England Patriots / 7th / 232nd pick / 2009 T Trent Brown San Francisco 49ers / 7th / 244th pick / 2015 T Marcus Cannon New England Patriots / 5th / 138th pick / 2011 C David Andrews RG Shaq Mason New England Patriots / 4th / 131st pick / 2015 DE Trey Flowers New England Patriots / 4th / 101st pick / 2015 DT Lawrence Guy Green Bay Packers / 7th / 233rd pick / 2011 LB Elandon Roberts New England Patriots / 6th / 214th pick / 2016 LCB Jason McCourty Tennessee Titans / 6th / 203rd pick / 2009 K Stephen Gostkowski New England Patriots / 4th / 118th pick / 2006 P Ryan Allen I guess that depends if you consider the punter and kicker as starters. However, the list of starters was anybody with 11 or more starts so it only included 10 each on def and off so you can probably add in two more guys. Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on April 29, 2019, 04:13:22 pm How freaking impressive is that? Screw the Super Bowls ... New England is killing the draft and doing it from the back of the pack. I actually it is only one more than the Dolphins.... WR Danny Amendola 33 WR Kenny Stills 26 New Orleans Saints / 5th / 144th pick / 2013 LG Ted Larsen 31 New England Patriots / 6th / 205th pick / 2010 RG Jesse Davis 27 Defensive Starters DE Cameron Wake 36 DT Davon Godchaux 24 Miami Dolphins / 5th / 178th pick / 2017 DT Akeem Spence 27 Tampa Bay Buccaneers / 4th / 100th pick / 2013 CB Bobby McCain 25 Miami Dolphins / 5th / 145th pick / 2015 S Reshad Jones 30 Miami Dolphins / 5th / 163rd pick / 2010 K Jason Sanders 23 Miami Dolphins / 7th / 229th pick / 2018 P Matt Haack 24 Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: CF DolFan on April 29, 2019, 04:28:37 pm I actually it is only one more than the Dolphins.... They were starters on one of the worst teams in the league and it's more because we can't draft at the top. We are 3 out of our last 7 for first round drafts. Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: EDGECRUSHER on April 30, 2019, 08:58:31 am They were starters on one of the worst teams in the league and it's more because we can't draft at the top. We are 3 out of our last 7 for first round drafts. 2011 15 Mike Pouncey Center Florida 2012 8 Ryan Tannehill Quarterback Texas A&M 2013 3 Dion Jordan Defensive end Oregon 2014 19 Ja'Wuan James Offensive tackle Tennessee 2015 14 DeVante Parker Wide receiver University of Louisville 2016 13 Laremy Tunsil Tackle Mississippi [t] 2017 22 Charles Harris Defensive end Missouri 2018 11 Minkah Fitzpatrick Safety Alabama A bad team like us picking higher should really be 100% but we got it right 5 out of the last 8 times not counting this year which should be another hit. Pouncey, Ryan, James(5 year starter at league average or a bit above), Tunsil and Minkah. Harris can still prove himself with luck but Parker and Jordan were huge misses. Never draft 1st rounders with injury problems. Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: CF DolFan on April 30, 2019, 09:42:34 am Pouncey was good but that still is only 4 out of 8. I like Tannehill but he is far from a success story and pretending he was just shows how desperate for success we are. He's really more suited for back-up role than leading a team for a comeback. Tunsil and Fitzpatrick are solid picks and luckily ... they both fell to us. Ja'Wuan James was decent but not a stud by any means. Neither Parker or Harris has shown they are worthy to start on a decent team and Dion Jordon was a complete and utter bust and I believe Parker is headed there too. That means Pouncy, Tunsil, and Fitzpatrick were good picks and James was a decent one.
First round talents should always contribute and we aren't even close. Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: masterfins on April 30, 2019, 12:46:40 pm How freaking impressive is that? Screw the Super Bowls ... New England is killing the draft and doing it from the back of the pack. I don't think it's that impressive. Three of the players were drafted by other teams, punter and kicker really don't count because those players should never be drafted in the top three rounds. I give them credit for hitting on two players in 2011 and two players in 2015; other than that I'll bet most teams have several players drafted after round three over a seven year period. Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on April 30, 2019, 01:03:43 pm I don't think it's that impressive. Three of the players were drafted by other teams, punter and kicker really don't count because those players should never be drafted in the top three rounds. I give them credit for hitting on two players in 2011 and two players in 2015; other than that I'll bet most teams have several players drafted after round three over a seven year period. You give credit for hitting in 2011 and 2015 but NOT 2000? Really? That guy is pretty good too. Actually I consider Trent Brown's benefit to the Patriots to be a greater hit than say Amendola for the Dolphins. Patriots paid less in draft capital to squire him than they will get back in compensatory pick and cash wise they paid him rookie contract money. On the hand, Dolphins paid Amendola FA money. What I think the Patriots do a bit better is not the total number of low draft pick starters as much as low cost starters, either late picks, UDFA or other teams cast offs as opposed to paying big cash in FA to squire talent. I recall BB mentioning he considers the salary cap to be more to a limit than the number of draft picks. e.g. If he was given the choice of extra picks or extra salary cap space he would prefer the cap space. Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: masterfins on May 01, 2019, 12:24:56 pm You give credit for hitting in 2011 and 2015 but NOT 2000? Really? That guy is pretty good too. He's okay, I guess. lol I figured that went without saying; but you have to admit that was pure luck, otherwise he would have been drafted much earlier. Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on May 01, 2019, 12:50:41 pm He's okay, I guess. lol I figured that went without saying; but you have to admit that was pure luck, otherwise he would have been drafted much earlier. yes and no. BB wanted to draft him earlier but he didn’t have final say of the 2000 draft. Him being right and everyone else being wrong was a huge factor in him having final say in later drafts. Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on May 01, 2019, 06:25:16 pm Pouncey was good but that still is only 4 out of 8. I like Tannehill but he is far from a success story and pretending he was just shows how desperate for success we are. He's really more suited for back-up role than leading a team for a comeback. Tunsil and Fitzpatrick are solid picks and luckily ... they both fell to us. Ja'Wuan James was decent but not a stud by any means. Neither Parker or Harris has shown they are worthy to start on a decent team and Dion Jordon was a complete and utter bust and I believe Parker is headed there too. That means Pouncy, Tunsil, and Fitzpatrick were good picks and James was a decent one. First round talents should always contribute and we aren't even close. I don’t know what the results would be cause I haven’t looked it up....but I would say a good objective measure of how successful a team is with the first round would be if the team picked up the 5th year option or not. Title: Re: Grading the 2016 Post by: Dolphster on May 02, 2019, 07:39:55 am I don’t know what the results would be cause I haven’t looked it up....but I would say a good objective measure of how successful a team is with the first round would be if the team picked up the 5th year option or not. Lack of other options at that particular position and finances might play a role in it, but I would say your idea is probably as quantifiable and objective way to look at it as any. |