The Dolphins Make Me Cry.com - Forums

TDMMC Forums => Off-Topic Board => Topic started by: jtex316 on April 26, 2006, 09:46:28 am



Title: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: jtex316 on April 26, 2006, 09:46:28 am
Thanks to this clown, no one knows how to spell this word anymore. 

So here it is.  Learn it:

L-U-D-I-C-R-O-U-S.

Stop typing in "ludacris", unless you like to "act a fool".


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Brian Fein on April 26, 2006, 09:51:18 am
What If I like to Roll Out on a Saturday?



Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: JVides on April 26, 2006, 09:51:35 am
Jtex, don't even get me started on how poorly people spell.  I learned to write in three languages, they can't master one?

Some of my favorites:

Your a jerk.

They're hair was on fire.

I went too the supermarket.

Were did you go last night?

Last night we went out and looked at car's.


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Denver_Bronco on April 26, 2006, 10:00:40 am
Thanks to this clown, no one knows how to spell this word anymore. 

So here it is.  Learn it:

L-U-D-I-C-R-O-U-S.

Stop typing in "ludacris", unless you like to "act a fool".
Pardon me for the error. I was going to spell check but figured that you would catch it, if it was misspelled.  ::)


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: jtex316 on April 26, 2006, 10:02:58 am
People are lazy, and have no pride in their spelling.


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Denver_Bronco on April 26, 2006, 10:55:00 am
People are lazy, and have no pride in their spelling.
I am only lazy when i am at work. Otherwise i am a ball of fire...


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Jeno on April 26, 2006, 11:16:01 am
I am only lazy when i am at work. Otherwise i am a ball of fire...

Amen! ;D



Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: CF DolFan on April 26, 2006, 11:56:18 am
Which reminds me ... this place needs spell check!!!


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Sunstroke on April 26, 2006, 01:12:34 pm
Jtex, don't even get me started on how poorly people spell.  I learned to write in three languages, they can't master one?

Some of my favorites:

Your a jerk.

They're hair was on fire.

I went too the supermarket.

Were did you go last night?

Last night we went out and looked at car's.

JVides...as a former copy editor (and multi-lingual), I definitely feel your pain.  I read through a lot of the posts on this and other boards, and I just want to gouge my eyes out sometimes. The only thing I've found that helps me deal with the general illiteracy of America is to keep myself heavily sedated at all times.  :-\







Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: SCFinFan on April 26, 2006, 01:35:35 pm
One of the biggest gaps in my education is my monolingualism. While I can usually read Spanish and some rather rudimentary Latin, I'm pretty much locked in to English and English-only. It really sucks and is one of my biggest insecurities, especially when you come across someone who can switch and mix and match quickly, accurately, and with ease. It's a great skill to have.

One disagreement that I have with people like Sunstroke and JVides is that I believe standardization of spelling to be overrated. Yeah, sure, it makes things much more efficient and easier, but it also really limits some of the freedom and playfulness that's rooted into the DNA of the language itself. Standardization makes English more like Latin than actual English... but, that's the tradeoff I guess.


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Denver_Bronco on April 26, 2006, 01:40:33 pm
"My power is discombobulatingly devastating I could feel is muscle tissues collapse under my force. It's ludicrous these mortals even attempt to enter my realm."~Mike Tyson


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Sunstroke on April 26, 2006, 02:06:04 pm

One disagreement that I have with people like Sunstroke and JVides is that I believe standardization of spelling to be overrated. Yeah, sure, it makes things much more efficient and easier, but it also really limits some of the freedom and playfulness that's rooted into the DNA of the language itself.

I am all for a little spelling flexibility when it's being used to express a little flava. Groovy little colloquialisms...bring them on! Ebonics? ...pardon me, stewardess...I speak jive! What JVides was talking about that I raised the "Hallelujiah" cry in support of was:

Your - You're
Too - Two - To
They're - Their - There
Where - Were - Wear

IMO, these aren't so much flava-adaptations as they are just plain language laziness.  ;)



Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: JVides on April 26, 2006, 02:17:28 pm
Quote
One disagreement that I have with people like Sunstroke and JVides is that I believe standardization of spelling to be overrated.  Yeah, sure, it makes things much more efficient and easier, but it also really limits some of the freedom and playfulness that's rooted into the DNA of the language itself

Look, I'm fine with playing with words (or being lazy with editing or with spell check) on a message board, or when texting your buds or whatever, but spelling and grammar deficiencies extend to highly paid, highly educated professionals, too.  For example:

I once received an e-mail from a fellow board member (she's a highly paid professional in the financial field) at my condo association in which she stated that she was "copulating a list of items"...and I'm left with the mental image of her trying to somehow screw a list.  I'm sure she ment compile.

Another time, one of my (former) supervisors sent an e-mail to all store managers (my pre-edumacation job) saying that "mediocracy would not be tolerated."  Again, he meant mediocrity, but I'm left thinking:  he doesn't want mediocre work, but announces it by sending an e-mail with mediocre (well, flat out bad) English.


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Frimp on April 26, 2006, 02:28:07 pm
Prepare the ship...for Ludacris speed!

 ;D


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Dave Gray on April 26, 2006, 03:05:19 pm
rediculous.

It's "Ridiculous"....from the word "ridicule."


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Frimp on April 26, 2006, 03:07:02 pm
rediculous.

It's "Ridiculous"....from the word "ridicule."

Got your dickshunarry out?  ;D


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Dave Gray on April 26, 2006, 03:08:07 pm
Nah, I just notice that Brian says it a lot.

And Scar Man says "your", instead of "you are".

And someone else says "know" instead of "now".


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Frimp on April 26, 2006, 03:12:15 pm
Another one that I see frequently is "noone" instead of "no one"


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Brian Fein on April 26, 2006, 04:15:51 pm
Nah, I just notice that Brian says it a lot.

I know, I'm bad about that.  I usually correct it when I catch it, but its force of habit.


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Denver_Bronco on April 26, 2006, 04:39:32 pm
Nah, I just notice that Brian says it a lot.

Brian also says that Denver sucks, so take it with a grain of salt.... :D


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Sunstroke on April 26, 2006, 05:06:38 pm
I think my spelling and vocabulary are just fine... The area where I get lazy on these boards...is in the punctuation, particularly my old pal... the ellipsis... I tend to write like I am speaking when posting here...and I abuse the ellipse as a means to convey a pregnant pause. I shouldn't do that...but I just can't help it...my bad...  :P


edited in response to the first strike Scud in what will surely go down in the history books as "The Spelling Wars"


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Brian Fein on April 26, 2006, 05:49:22 pm
Hey Stroke -

el·lipse   (-lps)
n.

   1. A plane curve, especially:
         1. A conic section whose plane is not parallel to the axis, base, or generatrix of the intersected cone.
         2. The locus of points for which the sum of the distances from each point to two fixed points is equal.


el·lip·sis   (-lpss)
n. pl. el·lip·ses (-sz)

   1.
         1. The omission of a word or phrase necessary for a complete syntactical construction but not necessary for understanding.
         2. An example of such omission.
   2. A mark or series of marks (... or * * *, for example) used in writing or printing to indicate an omission, especially of letters or words.


 ;D


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Thundergod on April 26, 2006, 05:53:37 pm
^^^


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v693/lordthundergod/scoreit.gif)


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: YoFuggedaboutit on April 26, 2006, 06:29:38 pm
Fancy Cars
The woman and the caviar
You know who we are
Cuz we be pimpin all over tha world!!!!!


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: bsmooth on April 27, 2006, 12:17:40 am
Look, I'm fine with playing with words (or being lazy with editing or with spell check) on a message board, or when texting your buds or whatever, but spelling and grammar deficiencies extend to highly paid, highly educated professionals, too.  For example:

I once received an e-mail from a fellow board member (she's a highly paid professional in the financial field) at my condo association in which she stated that she was "copulating a list of items"...and I'm left with the mental image of her trying to somehow screw a list.  I'm sure she ment compile.

Another time, one of my (former) supervisors sent an e-mail to all store managers (my pre-edumacation job) saying that "mediocracy would not be tolerated."  Again, he meant mediocrity, but I'm left thinking:  he doesn't want mediocre work, but announces it by sending an e-mail with mediocre (well, flat out bad) English.


I am guessing she meant to coalate a list as this would save her from multiple paper cuts inside her vagina.


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Spider-Dan on April 27, 2006, 04:33:17 am
rediculous.

It's "Ridiculous"....from the word "ridicule."
Seconded.


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Spider-Dan on April 27, 2006, 04:35:16 am

I am guessing she meant to coalate a list as this would save her from multiple paper cuts inside her vagina.
Main Entry: col·late
Pronunciation: k&-'lAt, kä-, kO-; 'kä-", 'kO-"
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): col·lat·ed; col·lat·ing
Etymology: back-formation from collation
1 a : to compare critically b : to collect , compare carefully in order to verify, and often to integrate or arrange in order
2 [Latin collatus, past participle] : to institute (a cleric) to a benefice
3 a : to verify the order of (printed sheets) b : to assemble in proper order; especially : to assemble (as printed sheets) in order for binding
synonym see COMPARE
- col·la·tor /-'lA-t&r, -"lA-/ noun


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Sunstroke on April 27, 2006, 11:41:51 am

As many times as I've ignored a misspelling or incorrect word usage from "most" of this board's members...and I get slapped here on one?

You've gotta be fukkin' kidding me!







Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: SCFinFan on April 27, 2006, 11:47:18 am
It seems as though, with all the mistakes, the spelling standards don't really mean much after all.

Oh, and 'Stroke, I feel you on the ellipsis. My bane is the comma, and the semi-colon. I can never figure out whether or not to use one or the other when it comes to how I connect two independent clauses. (i.e. Should I use the ol' conjunction-plus-comma, or go straight semi-colon... ahh, the issues of English majors.)


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: jtex316 on April 27, 2006, 12:11:50 pm
Fancy Cars
The woman and the caviar
You know who we are
Cuz we be pimpin all over tha world!!!!!

WTF?


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Frimp on April 27, 2006, 12:24:54 pm
It seems as though, with all the mistakes, the spelling standards don't really mean much after all.

Oh, and 'Stroke, I feel you on the ellipsis. My bane is the comma, and the semi-colon. I can never figure out whether or not to use one or the other when it comes to how I connect two independent clauses. (i.e. Should I use the ol' conjunction-plus-comma, or go straight semi-colon... ahh, the issues of English majors.)

I probably mis-spell a word every now and then. And, I probably misuse the comma as well.


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: bsfins on April 27, 2006, 01:23:51 pm
<---Biggest, Misspell, Mispunctionating, Language butcher on the board....(that actually attempts to speak English )
I don't do it everyonce in awhile,I do it every post!


[attachment deleted by admin]


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Sunstroke on April 27, 2006, 01:51:29 pm
Mispunctionating

^^  I have a new favorite word...thanks Lil_B!  ;D




Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Lee on April 27, 2006, 03:32:33 pm
It seems as though, with all the mistakes, the spelling standards don't really mean much after all.

Oh, and 'Stroke, I feel you on the ellipsis. My bane is the comma, and the semi-colon. I can never figure out whether or not to use one or the other when it comes to how I connect two independent clauses. (i.e. Should I use the ol' conjunction-plus-comma, or go straight semi-colon... ahh, the issues of English majors.)

I think you use the semi-colon where you could use the 'and' conjunction... but I may be wrong.

I, too, use ellipsis way too often.


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Dave Gray on April 27, 2006, 04:04:39 pm
I think you use the semi-colon where you could use the 'and' conjunction... but I may be wrong.

Sort of...a semi-colon is used where the 'and' conjuction is often misused in run-on sentences.  It's basically the "and" when you're using 2 seperate but related thoughts.



Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: YoFuggedaboutit on April 27, 2006, 07:21:10 pm
WTF?

Don't tell me you've never heard that song.  It's by the rapper known as "Ludacris"


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: GUATARICCAN on April 27, 2006, 09:22:13 pm
Don't tell me you've never heard that song.  It's by the rapper known as "Ludacris"

Have you seen his avatar? It's GNR. Something tells me JTex is not a big fan of the hip hop.


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: YoFuggedaboutit on April 27, 2006, 09:27:30 pm
Have you seen his avatar? It's GNR. Something tells me JTex is not a big fan of the hip hop.

Still, when the song was played on practically every major radio station, he HAD to have heard it. 


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Frimp on April 27, 2006, 09:34:19 pm
Still, when the song was played on practically every major radio station, he HAD to have heard it. 

I've never heard it.


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: GUATARICCAN on April 27, 2006, 10:23:48 pm
Still, when the song was played on practically every major radio station, he HAD to have heard it. 

Maybe he doesn't listen to Power 96 or 99 Jamz or 103.5 the beat or even Y100.  :|


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: JVides on April 27, 2006, 11:29:31 pm
Quote
Maybe he doesn't listen to Power 96 or 99 Jamz or 103.5 the beat or even Y100.

You mean Gayer 96, 99 Lamez, 103.5 beat the meat, or Why100?   Do any of those play Metallica?


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: run_to_win on April 28, 2006, 12:02:58 am
As many times as I've ignored a misspelling or incorrect word usage from "most" of this board's members...and I get slapped here on one?

You've gotta be fukkin' kidding me!
It's not expected from you.


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: YoFuggedaboutit on April 28, 2006, 07:07:22 am
You mean Gayer 96, 99 Lamez, 103.5 beat the meat, or Why100?   Do any of those play Metallica?

Man, this reminds me of old high school times.  My little brother was two years behind me and a complete opposite of me.  He was a headbanger and I was a hip-hopper. 

Y-100 plays an even mix of music so they might play Metallica. 


Title: Re: Ludacris is Ludicrous
Post by: Brian Fein on April 28, 2006, 08:25:28 am
As many times as I've ignored a misspelling or incorrect word usage from "most" of this board's members...and I get slapped here on one?

You've gotta be fukkin' kidding me!

Just ribbin' ya, dude - Had to do it given the topic of this thread...  ;)  Its not often we get to scramble your circuits, you gotta take the shots when you get em! :)