The Dolphins Make Me Cry.com - Forums

TDMMC Forums => Dolphins Discussion => Topic started by: dolphins4life on December 13, 2017, 10:00:27 pm



Title: Could Cutler be better than Tannehill?
Post by: dolphins4life on December 13, 2017, 10:00:27 pm
Tannehill as a starter: 37-40

Cutler as a starter: 5-5.

I could be completely wrong about everything I have ever said.


Title: Re: Could Cutler be better than Tannehill?
Post by: fyo on December 14, 2017, 01:29:24 am
How come I KNEW you'd be the author of this post after reading the topic?


Title: Re: Could Cutler be better than Tannehill?
Post by: dolphins4life on December 14, 2017, 01:37:46 am
It shows who starts a thread right next to it. 


Title: Re: Could Cutler be better than Tannehill?
Post by: fyo on December 14, 2017, 03:14:13 am
It shows who starts a thread right next to it. 

I also knew that's what you'd respond. Sigh.

What I'm saying is, clearly, that I knew YOU were the poster just by glancing at the topic (and I don't actually see the name of the poster when zoomed in on my cell phone).

-------------

Honestly, I don't know whether to take you question seriously.

Cutler is DEFINITELY not better now than Tannehill, if both were healthy. Tannehill isn't, of course, so the point is moot.

By the way, what happened to your man crush on Moore? That cooled quickly.

Quote
The mantra for this season:  If only they started Moore. 

Quote
Gase for not starting Matt Moore right from the beginning.

Quote
This is for everybody on the board.  Is there anybody out there who now truly believes that Matt Moore should not be the starter? 

Quote
Moore is better than Tannehill

Quote
I am boycotting the season, except for this site, if Cutler sees the field again.

Quote
Matt Moore

This guy is just unbelievable.

Quote
Matt Moore should have been starting from week 1.

There is a reason it's so difficult to take anything you post seriously.


Title: Re: Could Cutler be better than Tannehill?
Post by: CF DolFan on December 14, 2017, 09:21:28 am
The answer to your question isn't really answerable at this point. Tannehill opens the game up because he can run. That's a much different game. He also hit more bombs in his last season and made Kenny Stills a rich man. Just as everything was coming together he got hurt so you can only "assume" if he is or isn't.


Title: Re: Could Cutler be better than Tannehill?
Post by: Sunstroke on December 14, 2017, 09:33:54 am
Tails it is...


(http://bestanimations.com/Money/Coins/flipping-coin-animated-gif-1.gif)


Title: Re: Could Cutler be better than Tannehill?
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 14, 2017, 12:02:59 pm
One has a win % of .500 the other .481, that is the difference between missing the playoffs ............








by 2 games and missing the playoffs by 2 games and a tie breaker.


Title: Re: Could Cutler be better than Tannehill?
Post by: masterfins on December 14, 2017, 02:11:25 pm
Tails it is...


(http://bestanimations.com/Money/Coins/flipping-coin-animated-gif-1.gif)


Stop. I'm not suppose to be laughing out loud at work.


Title: Re: Could Cutler be better than Tannehill?
Post by: Sunstroke on December 14, 2017, 04:01:38 pm
Stop. I'm not suppose to be laughing out loud at work.

A semi-wise young poet once claimed that "Laughter is the voice of God, and we should all talk to The Man everyday..."

One is glad to be of assistance. ;)



Title: Re: Could Cutler be better than Tannehill?
Post by: dolphins4life on December 14, 2017, 08:30:18 pm
Tannehill as a starter: 37-40

Moore as a quarterback 3-3

Cutler as a starter: 5-5

BTW, Stroke, do you have a Jimmy G jersey I can borrow for the game on Saturday?


Title: Re: Could Cutler be better than Tannehill?
Post by: Tenshot13 on December 18, 2017, 12:56:25 pm
Still think Cutler might be better than Tannehill?


Title: Re: Could Cutler be better than Tannehill?
Post by: Dolphster on December 18, 2017, 03:24:14 pm
You know a QB is struggling with accuracy when you watch a game (yesterday) and there at least 8 instances when you seriously have no idea who the intended target was.