The Dolphins Make Me Cry.com - Forums

McMahon is bringing it back with another eight teams.  The article said there wasn't going to be a franchise system.  So I was thinking they should model it more after the WWE whereby they travel around to different cities.  They could name teams by state/area and then have them play at various stadiums. For example they could have one team for Texas, California, New York, Florida, Midwest, Atlantic Coast, etc.; then have each team play one or two home games at a variety of different stadiums.  So the Florida team could play at Miami, Tampa, Jacksonville, Orlando, etc.  This may keep the attendance up because fans may be interested in going to one or two games, but not a whole season of eight.  This way they would draw fans from a much larger pool of spectators.

Orlando is the ugly step brother who always gets a "want to be" football team. We've got crappy basketball, crappy soccer, second rate hockey and so we are destined to get another temporary football league. I can't wait for "He Hate Me" to take the field again.

I bet you they'll try to capitalize on the kneeling controversy.

I can see the names on the back of jerseys now.....

"U mad bro"

"Dilly dilly"

"Make the XFL great again"

"The Wall"

Yes, McMahon has already said everyone stands for the National Anthem.

It's going to be a ten game schedule, and "family friendly".

It's not going to have all these rules and regulations that slow down the game.
But also, it's going to be safer!  The faster, the safer, as the saying goes.

Furthermore, there will be no room for politics in the XFL.  These players have one job: to play football.
Which they will get to right after they are compelled to solemnly stand at attention for the national anthem of whatever country they happen to be playing in that day.

I don't see it being safer. The previous XFL was much more dangerous. The "kick-off" almost always ended in injury. As well ... I have to wonder about the family friendly issue. The former cheerleaders looked like strippers.

It's a huge reach to say requiring your employees to stand for the anthem is political. I had to be at a 6:00am meeting this morning because my boss told me to. Such is life when you work for someone else. I can accept the rules or move on. 

Given the context there is no way for it not to be a political statement.  Here is a quick test if they had a policy that prohibited the players to stand would you consider that a political statement?  Then the opposite is also true.  Separate issue does the XFL as a private entity have a right to make such a requirement? Absolutely!

I don't know for certain, but I imagine that they will make a point to say that it's required and overplay the importance of the national anthem thing.  It's just a business decision, trying to capitalize on the bad blood that a lot of middle America has with the NFL right now.

I really didn't watch 2 minutes of any XFL games the first time around...probably won't watch it this time.

They also will not allow players with criminal records. Good luck.

This,why would/should I watch? Has beens,never made it,over the hill,couldn't cut it in the other leagues playing crappy football games? no thank you.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/01/29/mlb-forces-cleveland-to-relinquish-offensive-logo/

This too is also both a political statement and a business decision. 

Seems like many people think that things they are in favor of are not political, while things they are against are politicizing sports.  For example, I attended an NBA game last February that had a Black History Month video in between quarters.  I am nearly certain you would consider that political.

I wholeheartedly agree that leagues have the right to set the standard of employment.  But call it what it is.

When the NFL has these parades of tribute to the military before games, don't try to claim it isn't political just because you approve of it.  I would imagine that American citizens who are pacifists and against the glorification of war would find it extremely political.

Well up until a year or so ago it was paid advertising by the government, ostensibly to increase recruitment.

Actually Black History month has never bothered me nor has Irish-American Heritage Month. If the NBA wants to promote a learning cause where it affects the mojority of the league then I can't see where that is a problem. I wouldn't have an issue with them doing it in the NFL either ... as they support different things all the time.  I have no issue with people embracing their/our history. I do have issue with people coming from other countries and then trying to dictate how we live rather than assimilate as our ancestors did. I also have issue with people trying to live in the past but that goes well beyond racial boundaries.

Out of curiosity CF, which of our "ancestors" was it exactly that assimilated with the native tribes when they came to this country ? Seems like they did alot of things and dictating how we live was pretty much in the top 3.

You must be referring to the Pilgrims, we celebrate this every year, it's called Thanksgiving.  ::)

Yes, because I'm sure you woke up this morning, spent an hour in your sweat lodge, then prayed to the Eagle Spirit to guide you on your journey...


So, your post must have been referring to your ancestors from the future?

Straw man argument. All of us, including the Native Americans, came from somewhere else and if you look back far enough .... have been persecuted or taken over by someone else at some time or another. I'm Irish, Cherokee, and English so I guess I'm both a victim and a criminal in your eyes. This would point to why we can't live in the past but move forward and try not to make those same mistakes.

The United States Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787 and included Article I, section 8, clause 4 of the Constitution expressly gives the United States Congress the power to establish a uniform rule of naturalization. It was at that point we became a nation of laws and as the preamble the states these laws are to "secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity". Posterity means future generations.

^^^^  it sounds like you are claiming it is okay for Trump to persecute Mexican Americans because others persecute Irish Americans

Huh? Not sure I get how you reached that conclusion. I stated every race has seen it's share of persecutions and injustice and we should move on from the of the past. We don't gain anything by bringing it up over and over and trying to make people feel guilty for the sins of their ancestors. We actually gain when we can move on and not be reminded of the past.

When a black man is selected as coach of an NFL team no one bats an eye. That's progress and you move on. Bringing up how there used to be no black coaches over and over doesn't help the process ... it just extends the pain.

I've spent a lot of time in therapy and the one thing all counselors seem to agree on is there comes a point when you have to choose to move on or you will never "get-over" it. Don't forget what you've learned but quit looking back. Politics is the exact opposite and it only breaks us down.

i'll give you the benefit of the doubt CF  .. i was referring to what you said here:

Just because there are naturalization laws, doesn't mean that immigrants don't have the right o live however they want. They are fully within their rights to come to this country and choose not to assimilate. Just like your ancestors did. If they want to not speak english and they live in a community where it isn't required, then good for them. If they want to live here and decide that they only want to live in Yurts then who cares.

My point was that ancestors didn't assimilate, they forced change when they got here, you can see that when you go to parts of the country settled by different nationalities, be it the irish in boston, or the germans in the midwest or the varied chinatowns or little havana. Time is the only process by which assimilation happens .. time and generational change. That's my point.

Living by the rules established for the country is assimilating to me. You can live your culture in your community. I don't see an issue with south Florida turning Cuban as that is bound to happen in areas. If you come here and say we need to learn your language or feel you should be able to live by Sharia Law ... then I take issue with things like that. One of those goes against a long standing "tradition of the masses" and the other goes directly against our laws. Coming to America used to be point of pride for immigrants and it should still be. If its not then you shouldn't come.

I think the XFL ran it's course

Nobody has tried to impose Sharia law.  Unless you take "imposing Sharia law" to mean allowing Muslims to practice their own religion.  Having Laws on the books in some states mandating stores close for Christmas is mandating Christian Law.  Allowing a Kosher bakery to be open on Sunday and close on Saturday is not mandating Talmud Law, it is allowing an exception to Christian Law.

I locked this once. Please leave it locked. Not even close to being on topic