I think the issue with China is that it sees Russia flailing in Ukraine. It sees the US massacring the leadership of Iran. It notices that it's own oil supply, which is heavily reliant on Iran, being cut off by this war. It recalls that none of its generals have seen war, and the last war they were in (with Vietnam) didn't pan out well for them. I think it's an effective deterrent, but I take your point.
A few points:
China was on the winning side in Vietnam, USA was on the losing side.
USA can NOT do to China what it did to Iran. China has nuclear ICBMs. USA can defend Twain, much like could defend Ukraine, but the USA can not risk the escalation that would occur if the USA was to drop bombs on Moscow or Beijing.
I suspect Moscow and Beijing are currently working on plans to improve the infrastructure to increase the flow of oil from Russia to China and by the time China launches the invasion they will be getting adequate supply from Russia, with the side effect of almost completely negating any boycott of Russia. As it is the two largest beneficiaries of Trump's war against Iran is Russia and Venezuela.
I will agree that DeSantis lost some shine after the 2024 election, but I also think there aren't really any other good candidates out there on the right, unless there's a serious upswing in the economy and general feeling of the country's populace. Who else do you pick? Thune? No. Rubio? I like him, but no. Vance? No. Polarizing, weird. So whom? DeSantis.
I don't like DeSantis but I do think a governor (rather than a sec, sen or rep) gives the repub there best shot at distancing themselves from Trump. But the challenge will be anytime a candidate answers the question "what is something you disagree with Trump on?" Trump is going to call that person a traitor on truth social. So most candidates are going to spend the primary praising Trump.
If the repubs really want to break from MAGA the ideal choice would be Brad Raffensperger.
If the Repubs really want to break from