Direct quotes:So we can tell their "personality" by how they celebrate wins, and their personality "isn't consistent with winning."
You are drawing a direct line between celebrations and culture, and an equally direct line between culture and winning.
To say "A = B" and "B = C" is to say "A = C."
You are drawing a direct line between celebrations and culture, and an equally direct line between culture and winning.
To say "A = B" and "B = C" is to say "A = C."
No that isn't the case. How single wins are celebrated isn't always indicative of a team's culture. In the case of the particular celebrations in the original post here, however, they are in my opinion. The Dolphins' current culture is silly and clownish, and the Steelers' culture in 2006 was serious and aggressive. If either team happened to celebrate a single win in a different fashion, their team cultures would nonetheless persist.
In other words, locker room celebrations can vary for a team, whereas its culture does not. The locker room celebrations in the original post were merely for illustrative purposes -- they show those teams' cultures in vivid fashion. Again in my opinion.
An analogy: every team varies in how well it plays single games. How good teams are overall persists, however. The Dolphins just beat Buffalo 30-13. Is that an indication of how good they are and how poor Buffalo is? Of course not. It was merely single-game variation. And single game locker room celebrations can similarly vary.
Quote
]However, a take like this rings somewhat hollow if you disappear when this logic can be used against you; to take a random example, if there were a coach that you criticized as being "unserious" who was sitting at 9-3 in the #1 seed entering week 14.
Being the #1 seed at 9-3 isn't a valid and reliable criterion for success overall as a head coach in the NFL. There are numerious head coaches in NFL history who accomplished similar feats and who were then fired without ever accomplishing anything extraordinary in the league.
Again are you still stuck here, using incredibly small samples of performance to measure overall head coaching success? Have you not yet learned anything in that regard?





