What I don't understand is why? It's the same system. We pretty much have similar offensive talent at the other skill positions. So now, we're not just getting production from that position, but we're getting it at a ton of value. Now that Jonnu is gone, I'm sad to see him go, because for whatever reason I can't figure out, he overachieved here. So, I get why you have to let him walk, since he's at his absolute high point. Sad, but that's the way it goes.
What I'd really like to know is, why did Gesicki come in at lesser than his value and Jonnu come in at more than his value? It's the same position, IMO there isn't a great skill difference; both are pretty good players. I ask this because, in looking for another TE, I think we have to try to reproduce whatever secret sauce Jonnu had and avoid whatever warts that Gesicki did, but I don't know what they are.
When McDaniel arrived, throwing to the TE was an afterthought, hence Gesicki was wasted in the offense. It was all about forcing the ball downfield deep to Tyreek and Waddle, and running the ball with Achane & Mostert.
Three major things changed last season:
1. Tyreek and Waddle couldn't get open (part of that was Tua not being there, part was other teams adjusting, part was us not adjusting to the rules officiating changes)
2. We couldn't run the ball effectively. The lack of a deep threat, Mostert having an off season and coughing up the ball were the major reasons (as well as O-Line injuries).
3. We tried to become more of a ball control offense to minimize the time our defense was on the field (as it had been gutted of talent in the offseason), and to cope with 1 & 2.
For a good third of the season, Smith hardly caught a ball which had a number of questioning why we brought him in - but with the above factors, all of a sudden he became a much more important part of the offense. I think if Gesicki was still there, he would have benefited likewise.