I don't think the Patsies signed Edds just because of his Dolphin knowledge, but now that he's been cut so shortly after the game against us, I find it a little suspicious. But then again, Edds kinda sucks so it shouldn't be a surprise.
Could be either. NE could have signed him for intelligence. But it is also possible that the NEP was actually interested in Edds. One of the problems with evaluting players, particularly defensive players, is you can't always be certain what their assignments was he suppose to play zone or follow the man? was he suppose to rush the passer or watch for the run? Once you bring him in you can evaluate him better. That might have been what happened. I doubt NE would have played him at all if he was purely intelligence.