Mass stabbing at Texas school results in... zero deaths

[MyGodWearsAHoodie]

Ok, you pasted the same thing Spider did.

which is def in the ban from 9/13/94-9/13/04.

Now, Is one of these an assault weapon? Are they both assault weapons?

don't know, apply the def to each weapon.  I am not a weapon's expert. 

[stinkyfish]

which is def in the ban from 9/13/94-9/13/04.

don't know, apply the def to each weapon.  I am not a weapon's expert. 

I have applied the definition to each weapon and I can't really tell how one is functionally different than the other. My theory is that the term "assault weapon" is a made up political term to scare people that don't know any better. I posted the pictures for someone to prove my theory wrong. I guess if no one here actually knows what an "assault weapon" actually is, then any reference to them should be left out of a rational discussion. At least until someone can actually tell us the difference in the pictures I posted.

[Fau Teixeira]

Really, haha that's funny. How can we have a discussion about "reasonable" gun legislation if the only person that will answer a question is someone that is so super ultra extreme in his view that it's pointless even replying to him. Where are all the ban the "assault weapon" people? If we are going to have a reasonable discussion, we all need to be on the same page on what an "assault weapon" actually is? 

No offense Fau, your position is so extreme and unrealistic that there is no point to continue down that road with you. Never the less, thank you for replying.

My position on guns is no more extreme than the republicans position on background checks.. or the NRA's position on gun safety regulation. My position is no more extreme than Grover Norquist's position on taxes.

Of course if you believe that the position of republicans on background checks, the NRA's position on gun legislation and Norquist's position on taxes are so extreme that people shouldn't even bother engaging them in conversation about those topics .. well .. touche.

[stinkyfish]

My position on guns is no more extreme than the republicans position on background checks.. or the NRA's position on gun safety regulation. My position is no more extreme than Grover Norquist's position on taxes.

Of course if you believe that the position of republicans on background checks, the NRA's position on gun legislation and Norquist's position on taxes are so extreme that people shouldn't even bother engaging them in conversation about those topics .. well .. touche.

Banning all firearms isn't going to happen, therefore there is no need to discuss it. And to think that the left said they wanted to talk about "reasonable" gun legislation. Your position isn't reasonable. You want to ban all firearms. Fine, go through the process to amend the constitution to get rid of the 2nd amendment. I would only have one condition to that scenario. If you lose, you can't challenge the 2nd amendment as it stands now for 100 years. All or nothing, but the left wouldn't make that deal because they know they can't win. Hell, they can't even get their own people on board with background checks.