|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MyGodWearsAHoodie
Global Moderator
Uber Member
    
Posts: 14976

|
 |
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2014, 03:14:43 pm » |
|
Sounds like an expensive hobby more than a job or a career. Which is going to be the Bills defense. Interesting to see if it works.
That won't be the Bills defense. It would work if the teams were not for profit entities (e.g. someone who gets a stipend to work for a non-profit search and rescue team). But it won't work for a for profit corporation. Nobody has a hobby of acting at the direction of a for profit corporation. The Bills defense (at least in the is motion) is that they don't hire cheerleaders. They hire a dance company to provide them with cheerleaders. If the cheerleaders are employees than they are employees of the dance company an should sue the dance company not the Bills. In much the same way that if Pappy sued Southwest for underpayment of wages, Southwest would make motion to dismiss and tell Pappy to go sue his employer (the agency he works for.) This motion will likely fail because the dance company only has one client and is in fact just an extension of the Bills. ***** It will be real interesting where teams go with this. For less money than they spend one practice player they could pay the entire team cheerleader fairly. Or to save few bucks they could do away with the team ambassadors.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 21, 2014, 03:35:11 pm by MyGodWearsAHoodie »
|
Logged
|
There are two rules for success: 1. Never tell everything you know.
|
|
|