|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spider-Dan
Global Moderator
Uber Member
    
Posts: 16379

Bay Area Niner-Hater
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: June 07, 2018, 04:08:12 am » |
|
No offense but that is a textbook snowflake answer. He didn't actually call them sons of bitches (he was speaking about a hypothetical situation) and even if he did ... that's not a big deal. Players object to being referred to as sons of bitches? Typical snowflake, grow a pair!Not enough players join the trip to the White House? You're disrespecting the office, visit cancelled!Ironic that you're talking about "snowflakes" when Trump is making up weak excuses to cover up for the fact that he doesn't want to be embarrassed by yet another tiny audience. What have we been conned about? Trump supporters are getting everything he promised. The single biggest promise of the Trump 2020 campaign was a giant southern border wall, paid for by Mexico. It does not exist, and it is not appreciably closer to existing than it was before his election. Or perhaps you were referring to Trump repealing Obamacare and replacing it with something much better and less expensive, which also has not happened? The only significant legislative achievement of the Trump Presidency has been an enormous tax cut that is permanent for corporations and the rich, but temporary for everyone else. When did he promise that?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 07, 2018, 04:17:21 am by Spider-Dan »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BigDaddyFin
Uber Member
    
Posts: 3538
watch me lose my mind, live and in full color.
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: June 07, 2018, 02:55:10 pm » |
|
the leagues aren't out for the best interest of the athletes, they're there to make as much money off of them as they can. that goes for the NFL, NCAA, Everyone.
The president doesn't invite the NFL champion cause he feels they deserve some honor, he does it to score political and public relation points with the people that like that team. Once the teams deny him that, he has no interest in it.
Players don't have to provide their likeness or talent for someone else's profit, nor should they risk their own livelihood for no reward. That's capitalism, that's not what bowl games are. I would be ok with NO player playing in a bowl game without compensation. Especially if they're risking immediate future income as a result.
Generally I would agree. My only difference is playing in an allstar game or the bowl game I would view as a source of pride, and I'd go see the president because it's an excuse to actually hang out at the White House. Compensation for the players is a bit of a different argument but I see where it fits in.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Hey... what's in the bowl bitch?
|
|
|
|
|