Nope, because average wealth doesn't make people CHOOSE to kill other people.
But
skin color "black culture" does?
When you say that "blacks are more likely to be poor." It's no different than saying "blacks are more likely to be violent." You're using a set of statistical data to make a general negative determination about a racial group.
Are you one of those "prosperity gospel" people that believes poor people are poor because of subpar morality, and that the rich are rich because of their outstanding character? Being poor is not a moral failing, unlike being a violent criminal (or, according to you,
skin color "black culture").
If you say "Blacks are more likely to have sickle-cell anemia," that is not a moral judgment. If you say "Blacks are more likely to be violent criminals," that is.
Racial and racist is not the same thing like you seem to think.
So I guess it's OK if we say that you're being "racialist"?
I hear "race realist" is the preferred term for today's up-and-coming eliminationists.
Author