Notwithstanding my previous questions, I read the article and as best I can tell, there have been
zero deaths reported as part of this study. Given the existing conservative position on COVID - namely,
if you don't die from COVID then it was overhyped and not a big deal - I am unsure as to why we would even discuss people who are not dead. Or to put it another way:
I got pericarditis after having Covid so I'm guessing the vaccines would probably affect me me in a similar way.
So you're saying there's a chance that the symptoms from the vaccine might be similar to... the symptoms you experienced
after recovering from being hospitalized with COVID. And therefore, this is (somehow?) evidence AGAINST getting the vaccine that has a ~100% chance of
preventing a person from being hospitalized with COVID. That, um, doesn't make sense.
Lastly, as a COVID survivor who has been vaccinated, I notice that this study does not seem to indicate the number of COVID survivors among the vaccinated subjects. This strikes me as an
incredibly important detail, as a vaccinated COVID survivor might be experiencing heart problems from the vaccine... or they might be experiencing
long-term side effects of COVID (one of which is, ahem,
heart problems). They might even be experiencing long-term COVID side effects
that would have been prevented if they had been vaccinated before being exposed to COVID.I think maybe you should spend less time on the Daily Mail website. It seems like you are posting articles from there rather frequently these days.