Everything was put together too well to just be a random event.
This is like being issued a license plate for your car and then saying that there was only a 1-in-78-million chance of receiving that exact (random) plate number, therefore someone must have picked it for you intentionally.
There is an infinite number of possible ways a universe (and its laws of physics) could function. Only the versions of a universe that have laws of physics that
allow for intelligent life to exist... are capable of producing a conversation in which lifeforms claim that universe must be designed for them on purpose.
There is also a shitload of examples as to why our "intelligently designed" universe has extremely poor design and is not very well put together at all. Why does cancer exist? Why is everything so far away from each other?
Atheism claims the Universe and the laws of physics were not designed but a random event. Theism claims it was designed on purpose. Neither side has more evidence than the other and both positions are equally arrogant.
Again, this is like saying it is
equally arrogant to claim "fairies exist" and "fairies do not exist."
Every
specific definition of a fairy doesn't exist. Making some broad, vague definition of "fairy" that is too unspecific to be disproven is also too unspecific to be meaningful. The exact same thing applies to theism and the supernatural: you can only avoid being directly disproven if you are too vague to say anything of substance.
People have no problem saying "Magic spells aren't real" without this same kind of mealymouthed "Well technically you have only proven THAT spell isn't real" silliness, because people don't have the same kind of emotional investment in magic spells as they do in sky gods. You would never apply this sort of hyperspecific standard of proof outside of religion.