I stand corrected. Accordinng to CNN Business 94% of their customer were over the $250,000 insured.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/16/investing/first-republic-bank/index.html Silicon Valley Bank had one of the highest rates of uninsured depositsSVB's percentage of both uninsured deposits and deposits that were loaned out is much higher than it is for other top banks. The latter made it more difficult for the bank to get access to cash when customers started pulling out their money.Split bar chart that shows the percentages of Silicon Valley Bank's uninsured deposits and deposits that were loaned out are much higher than they are for other top banks.Bank of New York Mellon 97% Uninsured Deposits & 31% Deposits that are loans or held-to-maturity securities
Silicon Valley Bank - 94% Uninsured Deposits & 94% Deposits that are loans or held-to-maturity securities
State Street Bank and Trust Co.- 91% Uninsured Deposits & 40% Deposits that are loans or held-to-maturity securities
Signature Bank - 90% Uninsured Deposits & 93% Deposits that are loans or held-to-maturity securities
Northern Trust Co. 83% Uninsured Deposits & 55% Deposits that are loans or held-to-maturity securities
What I don't understand is why anyone would hold more than $250K in a single bank since anything over that isn't insured.
That seems as stupid as the Government printing endless supply of money to freely hand out to other countries, bailout crooks and substandard businesses, fund other countries wars that have nothing to do with us, attempt to pay off loans that legal adults agreed to paid off, etc, etc, etc.
Seems like stupidity doesn't discriminate when it comes to money and finance