Because I'm not discussing this thread in PMs:
No, it means that I want our elections to be secure and safe. Allowing extensive mail-in balloting allows many opportunities for fraud and manipulation. For example, an elderly patient with dementia could be persuaded by her Democratic aide to fill out a ballot for Harris without knowing he or she is doing so.
There is no evidence of increased fraud or manipulation with mail-in balloting, be it "extensive" or not. Furthermore, the argument that
mail-in voters can be coerced could also apply to an active duty serviceman with his commanding officer looking over his shoulder as he fills out his ballot.
If there is an argument against the security of mail-in voting, that argument does not disappear when you put on an Armed Forces uniform. Absentee voting has been proven safe & secure for our troops and everyone else, too.
Have you ever mailed your mortgage payment IN CASH through the mail?
I'm not mailing cash with my ballot, so I don't see what this has to do with anything.
Cash is unsafe to mail because cash requires no authentication or verification to use. Voting by mail does require authentication and verification to be counted. It's no less secure than mailing a check, which I've done hundreds of times without an issue.