I guess you guys are right. I've just been thinking of needs and not necessarily the most impactful player. I know I sure wish we'd have drafted Ja'Marr Chase instead of Waddle. I like Waddle but he is not Chase.
MIA would not have been able to draft Chase "instead of" Waddle.
They would have only been able to draft Chase "instead of" trading the #3 pick to SF for three first-rounders (who ultimately became Waddle and Chubb).
Now, if we are operating with a crystal ball, and we know that:
1) CIN will draft Chase (instead of drafting a blue-chip OT to protect their already-injured #1 overall QB)
2) Chase will become a top 3 WR in the league, while Waddle will be an elite #2 at best
3) Van Ginkel will have a breakout 2024, making a trade for Chubb unnecessary
...then sure, passing on three firsts to pick Chase makes sense. But if you don't know the future, that's a very tough sell.