Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2025, 08:53:40 am
Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
News: Brian Fein is now blogging weekly!  Make sure to check the homepage for his latest editorial.
+  The Dolphins Make Me Cry.com - Forums
|-+  TDMMC Forums
| |-+  Other Sports Talk (Moderator: MaineDolFan)
| | |-+  Is anyone AGAINST a college football playoff?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 Print
Author Topic: Is anyone AGAINST a college football playoff?  (Read 18162 times)
Phishfan
Global Moderator
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 15775



« Reply #30 on: January 12, 2012, 06:29:13 pm »

You wouldn't be interested in the games that replaced them?  Sounds like the best of both worlds, keep the NCAA college football fan while adding those people who just like to watch NCAA tournament games like March Madness.

If they contract the bowl games into only a playoff they never would add enough playoff teams to equate to the same number of games. That is my point. I do not want the number of games contracted. it definitely wouldn't be the best of both worlds in that scenario.
Logged
Phishfan
Global Moderator
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 15775



« Reply #31 on: January 12, 2012, 06:32:45 pm »

meaningless bowl games

The use of meaningless is out of hand. Maybe you don't care but that doesn't make them meaningless, unless you take the position that this is just a game played for entertainment which makes them all meaningless in the grand scheme of things.
Logged
EKnight
GameDay Trolls
Uber Member
*
Posts: 2955



« Reply #32 on: January 12, 2012, 06:33:43 pm »

Well, it went somewhere. Sorry I accused you. Either way, though, my original point still stands- I believe that there's too many bowl games as it is, thus, my argument about academic integrity doesn't ring hollow- it makes perfect sense. -EK
Logged
Spider-Dan
Global Moderator
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 16149


Bay Area Niner-Hater


« Reply #33 on: January 12, 2012, 06:36:43 pm »

Disagree.  Bowl games are 1 game being played when school is not in session anyway.  How do you intend to play a tournament in the course of 2 weeks between final exams and Christmas?
The first bowl of the 2011-2012 bowl season was the New Mexico Bowl on December 17.
The last bowl of the 2011-2012 bowl season was the BCS National Championship on January 9.
You can't figure out how to schedule one extra game for 4 teams over 4 weeks?

Quote
Oh, F Christmas, right because these kids are professionals and have a job to do.  Oh, wait, right, they're not.
You do realize that there were 13 bowl games on 12/24, 12/26, 12/31, and 1/2, right?

You also realize that somehow, Division I-AA (and every other level of collegiate sports) somehow magically makes time for a playoff, right?  Do they simply not care about their students' academic standing at non-Division I-A schools?
« Last Edit: January 12, 2012, 06:41:06 pm by Spider-Dan » Logged

EKnight
GameDay Trolls
Uber Member
*
Posts: 2955



« Reply #34 on: January 12, 2012, 06:38:43 pm »

How do the smaller schools do it? They seem to have no problems with it. D3 starts their playoffs the last week of November and are done before Christmas. Their academic calendar is LESS disrupted than the BCS schools. -EK
« Last Edit: January 12, 2012, 07:09:57 pm by EKnight » Logged
Spider-Dan
Global Moderator
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 16149


Bay Area Niner-Hater


« Reply #35 on: January 12, 2012, 06:39:49 pm »

The use of meaningless is out of hand. Maybe you don't care but that doesn't make them meaningless, unless you take the position that this is just a game played for entertainment which makes them all meaningless in the grand scheme of things.
I call them "meaningless" in the same sense and to the extent that I call NFL preseason games "meaningless."
Logged

MaineDolFan
Global Moderator
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 11671

MaineDolFan
« Reply #36 on: January 12, 2012, 10:28:40 pm »

Well, it went somewhere.

It was moved to the trashcan by a global mod because that moderator (not me) felt it was an attack.

Keep the threads on target and not personal people, please.  All of you.  Thanks.
Logged

"God is a comedian, playing to an audience too afraid to laugh."
-Voltaire
Landshark
Guest
« Reply #37 on: January 12, 2012, 11:26:21 pm »

The current bowl system is a joke. It is based on fan draw as opposed to the best teams or match-ups. I see you conveniently leave out the fact that the bowl games are full of 6-6 or 7-5 teams to fill up the ridiculous amount of bowls there are.

I have to agree with this statement.  A perfect example was the Gator Bowl.  Florida and Ohio State, two 6-6 teams, had NO BUSINESS being in a premier New Years Day bowl game.    Bowl games are supposed to be rewards for successful seasons.  A 6-6 record with two wins against Division 1-AA schools is not success.
Logged
Phishfan
Global Moderator
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 15775



« Reply #38 on: January 13, 2012, 09:29:50 am »

I call them "meaningless" in the same sense and to the extent that I call NFL preseason games "meaningless."

Well they are actually part of the team's record, where NFL preseason games are not counted toward the record at all.
Logged
Dave Gray
Administrator
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 30970

It's doo-doo, baby!

26384964 davebgray@comcast.net davebgray floridadavegray
WWW Email
« Reply #39 on: January 13, 2012, 10:43:38 am »

In terms of sports, that's the way the word meaningless is used.

...just like the NFL games are meaningless when both teams are out of the playoffs and have locked up their draft spots.

But, I'm still not hearing anyone stand up against a playoff.  Don't play contrarian.  Is anyone AGAINST a playoff?  You can't really be conditionally against it, because we don't know how those conditions will evolve.  Do you feel that a playoff is required to fix the system or do you prefer the current system?
Logged

I drink your milkshake!
Pappy13
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 8456



« Reply #40 on: January 13, 2012, 10:59:41 am »

If they contract the bowl games into only a playoff they never would add enough playoff teams to equate to the same number of games. That is my point. I do not want the number of games contracted. it definitely wouldn't be the best of both worlds in that scenario.
That's not what is being proposed. The existing bowl games would all happen as they do today, the only thing that would change is that certain bowls would be decided by the rankings of the teams involved much like the National Championship game is decided today.  One bowl game would be #1 against #4 and another bowl game would be #2 against #3. Winners of those 2 games then play one more game to determine the National Championship. That's the "And 1" system.  That's a "playoff" system while maintaining the existing bowl games. Some are suggesting that could later be expanded to a "and 2" system where the top 8 teams enter bowl games and the winners of those games play and then the winners of those games play.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2012, 11:05:38 am by Pappy13 » Logged

That which does not kill me...gives me XP.
Phishfan
Global Moderator
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 15775



« Reply #41 on: January 13, 2012, 11:00:13 am »

In terms of sports, that's the way the word meaningless isover used.

Logged
Phishfan
Global Moderator
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 15775



« Reply #42 on: January 13, 2012, 11:05:08 am »

That's not what is being proposed. The existing bowl games would all happen as they do today, the only thing that would change is that certain bowls would be decided by the rankings of the teams involved.  One bowl game would be #1 against #4 and another bowl game would be #2 against #3. Winners of those 2 games then play one more game to determine the National Championship. That's the "And 1" system.  That's a "playoff" system while maintaining the existing bowl games.

There are may proposals out there. Just because this is one of them doesn't make it the only one. Everyone has a suggestion. One thing seems apparent though, after the current contract ends, there will be a change in college football.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2012, 11:08:38 am by Phishfan » Logged
Pappy13
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 8456



« Reply #43 on: January 13, 2012, 11:08:40 am »

^^It's the most likely scenario. I don't think anyone really believes you're going to just get rid of the current bowl system and replace it with a playoff system in one fell swoop. It's going to have to be a gradual thing, like the above system where people are gradually weened off the bowl system and into a playoff system.

Would you be against and "And 1" system? If so, why? It would actually increase the number college games played by 1, not reduce it.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2012, 11:10:38 am by Pappy13 » Logged

That which does not kill me...gives me XP.
Phishfan
Global Moderator
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 15775



« Reply #44 on: January 13, 2012, 11:13:27 am »

I don't want to give the impression I am against a playoff. My only stance is I don't want the number of games played contracted.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

The Dolphins Make Me Cry - Copyright© 2008 - Designed and Marketed by Dave Gray


Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines